Contact: +971 52 690 32 40 (ICT & ELV) | +971 56 625 25 68 (Solution & Services)

Structured Cabling: What to Check Before a Network Upgrade

Active equipment can only deliver its intended link performance when the supporting passive infrastructure meets the application’s requirements.

Structured cabling should form part of the first network-upgrade discussion. New switches, Wi-Fi access points and security devices depend on the copper, fiber and connections that carry their traffic. Therefore, review that infrastructure before finalizing the equipment list.

Consider a typical enterprise project: the organization wants better wireless coverage, additional cameras and faster connections between departments. The proposal includes new switches and endpoints. However, nobody has yet checked the existing cable routes, backbone capacity or test records.

The project may still succeed. Yet the team has left a major performance dependency unverified.

Active equipment can only deliver its intended link performance when the supporting passive infrastructure meets the application’s requirements.

Why structured cabling belongs in the upgrade brief

A network upgrade changes more than the equipment inside the rack. It can also change traffic patterns, uplink speeds, power demand and the number of connected devices.

For example, adding cameras across several buildings creates both local connections and traffic between those buildings. Similarly, installing more access points increases the number of wired links that the network must support.

Therefore, start with the services the site needs. Record current demand, expected growth and the consequences of an outage.

Then assess the structured cabling against those requirements. Existing infrastructure may remain suitable; its age alone does not settle the question.

Plan structured cabling for present and future bandwidth

First, separate the speed of an individual endpoint from the combined traffic that reaches the backbone.

An office workstation, camera and wireless access point may have different connection requirements. Meanwhile, their traffic can converge on the same links between telecommunications rooms.

As a result, a design that works at the endpoint can still leave a bottleneck elsewhere.

Build an endpoint schedule that identifies device locations, intended link speeds and expected expansion. In addition, record the uplinks that connect floors, buildings and central services.

For lifecycle planning, consider the next credible upgrade as well as today’s purchase. Avoid selecting capacity solely from the current device count.

Choose copper and fiber by application

Copper and fiber serve different needs. Therefore, choose between them using distance, bandwidth, power delivery, environment and the upgrade path.

Copper for horizontal cabling and powered endpoints

Horizontal cabling connects the telecommunications room to outlets or device locations across a floor or service area.

Copper Ethernet can carry both data and PoE to compatible devices. Consequently, it remains relevant for many access points, IP cameras and other network endpoints.

For new links that need 10GBASE-T, Category 6A deserves consideration. Belden’s REVConnect 10GXW system, for example, lists support for 2.5G, 5G and 10G Ethernet over 100-metre channels within its published system conditions. The complete channel includes connectivity and patch cords, not simply the installed cable.

However, do not treat that capability as a reason to replace every existing link. Assess the installed system against the intended application and verify its performance.

Fiber for backbone infrastructure

Fiber warrants consideration for links between telecommunications rooms, floors and buildings.

However, “fiber installed” does not tell the designer enough. Identify the fiber type, route length, available strands, connector arrangement and intended Ethernet application.

Singlemode and multimode support different combinations of reach and application. Therefore, compare them alongside compatible optics and the planned migration path.

Also, check the optical loss budget: the signal loss the application can tolerate. Cable, connectors and splices all contribute to that loss. A suitable fiber type alone does not establish that the complete link will work.

For future expansion, consider spare fibers, termination capacity and accessible pathways before installation begins.

Check structured cabling before a Wi-Fi upgrade

Wireless performance also depends on wired infrastructure.

Before selecting replacement access points, confirm each model’s Ethernet interface and power requirements. Then check the cabling that will serve its actual installation position.

For example, an access point with a multi-gigabit interface needs a wired path that supports the chosen uplink rate. However, its wireless generation alone does not determine the required port speed.

Belden’s current Wi-Fi 7 guidance recognises a continuing role for existing Category 6A cabling and RJ45 connectivity. Therefore, assess the selected access points and traffic needs before assuming a wholesale recabling project.

In addition, inspect the route to each new location. Moving an access point can change cable length, pathway access and installation requirements.

Include PoE growth, CCTV and access control

PoE planning needs more than a switch power-budget calculation.

Higher power delivery and cable bundling can raise cable temperatures. In turn, higher temperatures increase insertion loss, which can affect usable reach. Therefore, assess conductor size, bundle arrangement, ambient conditions and the manufacturer’s installation guidance together.

For CCTV, record camera locations, link distances and each device’s power requirements. Outdoor routes also need cable constructions and protection suited to their environment.

Similarly, distinguish an access-control controller’s network connection from its reader, lock and other field wiring. Those circuits may require different cable types and power arrangements.

Consequently, the endpoint schedule should describe how each device communicates and receives power. A generic allowance for “security cabling” leaves too many design decisions unresolved.

Treat patching and connectivity as part of the system

A cable specification does not describe the whole channel.

Patch cords, jacks, panels and terminations also contribute to performance. Therefore, specify compatible components and assess the installed path as a complete system.

For PoE applications, take particular care when selecting slim patch cords. Smaller conductors and dense bundles introduce thermal considerations; a thinner cord is not an automatic substitute in every design.

For fiber, account for the connections in the loss budget. In addition, provide accessible patching so technicians can inspect, clean and maintain the links.

Clear labels and usable cable management also make future changes easier. Include them in the project scope rather than leaving them until handover.

Where Belden fits into the design

Once the requirements are clear, select the passive infrastructure that addresses them.

Belden’s REVConnect Category 6A systems combine copper cable and connectivity. This makes them relevant when specifying a coordinated copper channel rather than choosing its components independently.

For fiber infrastructure, Belden’s FiberExpress portfolio includes systems for premises and campus backbones. Its FX ECX patch-panel system also provides an option for enterprise fiber patching.

However, product-family names are only the starting point. Match the selected components to the route, environment, application and installation requirements.

CST’s Belden scope focuses on passive infrastructure: copper cabling, fiber cabling and associated connectivity. The engineering requirement should lead that selection.

Build a lifecycle plan before placing the order

Before approving the upgrade, complete these five checks:

  1. Map the existing infrastructure. Record cable types, routes, lengths, patching and available test results.
  2. Define the applications. List endpoint locations, link speeds, power needs and backbone traffic.
  3. Identify gaps. Separate links that can remain from those that need repair, further testing or replacement.
  4. Allow for growth. Plan spare capacity in pathways, fiber strands, panels and telecommunications rooms.
  5. Specify handover evidence. Require appropriate copper certification, fiber test results, labels and as-built records.

For a phased project, also compare the disruption of installing additional capacity now with reopening occupied areas later.

This approach applies whether the site is an office in Nairobi, a hospital in Kampala or a campus in Nigeria. Local site conditions should drive the details.

The equipment quotation tells you what you plan to install. The infrastructure assessment tells you whether the site can support it.

Planning an upgrade? Share your site layout, endpoint schedule, existing cabling information and expansion plans with CST. We can help develop an appropriate Belden copper, fiber and connectivity approach.

The network starts before the switch.


About CST Pulse

CST Pulse is the technology insight platform of Core Solutions & Technologies, covering practical ICT and ELV topics for system integrators and technology partners across Middle East & Africa.

Tags: , , , , ,

Bring your next project to the table.

Talk to CST about this technology or application.

Discuss a project ↗

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *